A MESSAGE FROM THE FOUNDER - WHO I AM
I think it's important for participants to know that I am not a researcher, sponsor, clinic employee, or regulator. I am a healthy volunteer just like you!
I first started participating in studies at Celerion in Lincoln, near my hometown, back in the 1990s and continued on and off over the years.
After retiring about 11 years ago, I returned to doing studies full time. When I turned 55, I realized something I had not paid much attention to before. Even though I was still healthy, I found myself being excluded from studies because of some clinics' arbitrary age cutoff requirements.
The more I looked into this issue, I was unable to find any scientific justification for many of these exclusions. In fact, the FDA has encouraged the inclusion of healthy older adults in clinical research whenever appropriate. Unfortunately, because there are currently no clear guidelines governing the use of age cutoffs, clinics are still allowed to impose arbitrary age restrictions if they choose.
That experience made me start paying closer attention to some of the other challenges we face, and I started asking questions about whether those decisions were always fair or justified.
I’ll be honest, like many healthy volunteers, I originally started participating in studies because I needed the money. Over time, however, I started paying closer attention to the experiences of other participants and the many unfair situations we face while participating in studies. I understand why some people may be hesitant to trust another organization, even one such as HVA, that was designed specifically to advocate for them. Many participants have spent years feeling like they have nobody trustworthy to turn to when situations arise and no one to turn to for answers.
In the last year, I became involved in online participant chat groups where volunteers share their experiences. The more conversations and the more stories I heard, the more I realized that many of the concerns being discussed were not just one-time incidents. The same issues kept coming up over and over again from participant experiences across all different clinics.
I think we all know what the main concerns are:
Being banned or restricted from studies without clear explanations and no way to appeal.
No meaningful way to challenge decisions or even understand why they were made.
Inaccurate information placed in our records that affect future study opportunities and no clear pathway to resolve these issues.
Fear of reporting a concern or even asking a question, because of being labeled a troublemaker or possibly of being banned for speaking up.
What concerned me most was the lack of transparency and the feeling that participants often have no meaningful recourse because many do not know who to contact when problems arise or whether they should speak with study staff, clinic management, an IRB, a sponsor, or a regulatory agency.